The Influence Of Local Fidelity And Recruitment On Population Dynamics And Specialized Foraging Of Humpback Whales In Glacier Bay And Icy Strait Alaska

Humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae, Borowski 1781) in the North Pacific migrate from mid- to high- latitude summer feeding grounds along the Pacific Rim, including areas off the coasts of the U.S., Canada, Russia and eastern Asia, to tropical breeding grounds each winter along Pacific coasts of Mexico and Central America as well as the offshore islands of Mexico, Hawaii, and Japan. Humpback whales in the North Pacific and elsewhere were reduced to very low numbers during a period of intense commercial exploitation that ended in 1965. As the population recovers in abundance, the range of cultural and genetic diversity that survived the exploitation-driven bottleneck is able to adapt, endure and evolve. My work uses genetic tools and photo identification data to investigate the population dynamics, mitochondrial (mt) DNA control region evolution and potential drivers of a specialized feeding behavior in a recovering subpopulation of humpback whales in the Glacier Bay and Icy Strait (GBIS) sub-region of the southeastern Alaska (SEAK) feeding ground. I first collated and reconciled available DNA profiles (mtDNA control region, 10 microsatellite loci and sex) from 556 individuals using tissue samples collected from 1987 to 2012. Photo identification records associated with 692 of 1,026 total genetic samples collected in SEAK (now archived within the SEAK DNA Register and Tissue Database) corresponded to extensive life-history information, extending back to the early 1970s, as archived within the SEAK Regional Database, curated by the National Park Service (NPS) and University of Alaska, Southeast (UAS). Changes in population structure in GBIS over 32 years (1973-2005) were investigated in order to determine whether the increase in local abundance was attributable to local fidelity and recruitment or immigration from outside of SEAK. Two temporal strata were defined: 'Founder' individuals identified between 1973-1985 (n = 74, n = 46 with DNA profiles) and 'Contemporary' individuals identified between 2004-2005 (n = 171, n = 114 with DNA profiles). There was no significant genetic differentiation between the strata, indicating that it is unlikely that the population increase within GBIS was due largely to immigration of whales from elsewhere in the North Pacific. However, two additional haplotypes were documented in the Contemporary stratum at low frequency, one of which was previously unreported in the North Pacific (haplotype A8, see below). This relative stability in haplotype frequencies over time argues for strong regional fidelity of the maternal lineages represented in GBIS between 1973 and 1985. After excluding the 42 Contemporary whales with no photo ID record of a mother or genotype available for maternity inference, at least 73.6% (n = 95) of the Contemporary stratum was either a returning Founder or a recruited descendant of a Founder female. Of all genetically confirmed females with genotypes in the Founder stratum, 96% (n = 24) were either represented in the Contemporary stratum, had at least one confirmed descendant in the Contemporary stratum, or both. This high proportion, in addition to the large proportion of the verifiable Contemporary stratum that were either returning Founders or a descendant of a Founder female, provides clear evidence for local fidelity and recruitment to GBIS. The discovery of the A8 haplotype, which differs by one base pair from a common haplotype referred to as A-, represents an increase in mtDNA diversity for the North Pacific humpback whale from 28 to 29 haplotypes. To investigate the origin of this new haplotype, we re-evaluated n = 1089 electropherograms of n = 710 individuals with A- haplotypes from both the SEAK DNA Register and Tissue Database and the ocean-wide program, SPLASH (Baker et al. 2013). From this review, we identified two individuals with the A8 haplotype (a cow and calf, both sampled in GBIS) and n = 20 individuals with clear heteroplasmy for haplotypes A-/A8. The majority of A-/A8 individuals (n = 15) were sampled in SEAK. Genotype exclusion and likelihood were used to identify one of the heteroplasmic females, #196 (first sighted in SEAK in 1982), as the likely mother of the A8 cow and grandmother of the A8 calf, establishing the inheritance and germ-line fixation of the new haplotype from the parental heteroplasmy. Based on life history records and estimates of pairwise relatedness from microsatellite genotypes, it appears likely that the A-/A8 and the A8 individuals are descendants from a common maternal ancestor one or more generations prior to the three generations documented here. Humpback whale sociality takes a distinct form in Icy Strait, where whales form large, coordinated groups with repeated membership across several decades. Twenty-one years of group association records (1985-2005, n = 2,204 groups) were used to investigate the hypothesis that kin selection influences membership in large, stable groups. Of the 2204 groups recorded, 113 consisted of 6 or more individuals; a size considered unexpectedly large assuming a Poisson distribution of group size with a mean of 1.7. A total of n = 71 individuals (n = 48 with DNA profiles) were encountered in a large group in at least one year, n = 38 individuals (n = 34 with DNA profiles) were encountered in a large group in at least two years, n = 29 individuals (n = 27 with DNA profiles) were encountered in a large group in at least three years, decreasing to n = 2 individuals (n = 2 with DNA profiles) that were encountered in a large group in at least 20 years. There were no significant differences in mtDNA frequencies between large group feeders and the Founder and Contemporary strata or when compared to whales never encountered in large groups in Icy Strait, indicating that group membership is not predominately passed through one maternal lineage. Sex ratios did not deviate significantly from 1:1 for those feeding in large groups over an increasing number of years, as would be expected if females were actively recruiting offspring into large groups. The average pairwise relatedness for large group feeders was not significantly greater than expected by chance and did not increase for those feeding in large groups over an increasing number of years. Of the 179 known offspring of females encountered in a large group, only 6% were also encountered in a large group in Icy Strait as an adult and only 2.2% in the same large group as their mother. These results indicate that kin selection is not the primary driver of membership in large, stable groups and pose an interesting dynamic in local habitat use: individuals are recruited to GBIS through local maternal fidelity but do not usually associate closely with direct maternal kin. The extensive collection of DNA profiles now archived with the individual-based data within the SEAK Regional Database allowed us to integrate genetics and photo ID to answer ecologically relevant questions regarding the whales in GBIS. Together, these results demonstrate that GBIS provide habitat for a distinct collection of individuals that exhibit strong fidelity and local recruitment, some of which engage in a highly specialized feeding behavior. Further, GBIS is a local feeding habitat for two individuals with a newly arising North Pacific mtDNA haplotype. These findings reveal local genotypic and cultural variation and highlight the importance of habitat protection for species with fine-scale habitat use and strong fidelity to local migratory destinations.

In this book, an international team of leading marine mammal scientists, with a remarkably diverse set of backgrounds and areas of expertise, lead you through a synthesis of current knowledge on baleen whales. Baleen whales are the largest animals ever to have lived on this planet. They also have the lowest and most intense voices on Earth, most likely evolved to take advantage of ocean acoustic transmission conditions so as to be detectable across ocean basins. Some baleen whales can live to be 150-200 years old. They migrate many thousands of kilometers between feeding and breeding areas. They produce songs and calls that serve as behavioral foundations for establishing, maintaining and expanding their cultural identities. To conclude that we know the behavioral limits of these large brained, long-lived animals would be naïve. As baleen whale scientists, we are still beginning to comprehend the enormous complexities and natural histories of these remarkable animals. Today, the fact that whales sing is known throughout much of the world. This awareness started 50 years ago with the publication and popularization of a collection of humpback song recordings that motivated research into baleen whale behavioral ethology. In this book’s chapters, a reader’s experiences will stretch from learning about baleen whale laryngeal anatomy associated with their different voices to learning about the vast ocean areas over which their voices can be heard and the emerging complexities of their culturally defined societies. These are accompanied by chapters on the fundamental ethological contexts of socializing, migrating, and foraging. Two common themes permeate the book. One theme highlights the phenomenal increase in scientific knowledge achieved through technological advancements. The other theme recognizes the impacts of human-made activities on ocean acoustic environments and the resultant influences on the health and survival of individual whales and their populations. Although the book is intentionally ambitious in its scope, as scientists, we fully recognize that baleen whale science is still in its infancy. Many profound revelations await discovery by cohorts of young, multi-talented explorers, some of whom are stretching their wings in this volume and some of whom are reading these scientific stories for the first time.

In 'Humpback Whales in Glacier Bay National Monument, Alaska,' the United States Marine Mammal Commission provides a comprehensive study on the migration patterns, behavior, and conservation status of the iconic humpback whales in this particular region. The book is written in a scientific and analytical style, with detailed observations and data analysis that contribute to our understanding of the marine ecosystem within Glacier Bay National Monument. The authors utilize a multidisciplinary approach, combining biology, ecology, and environmental science to paint a holistic picture of the humpback whale population in Alaska. This book is a valuable resource for researchers, conservationists, and anyone interested in marine mammal studies. It sheds light on the importance of preserving the delicate balance of marine life in this unique and biodiverse region. The authors, affiliated with the Marine Mammal Commission, bring a wealth of expertise and experience to the subject matter, making this book a relevant and authoritative source for marine conservation efforts. Readers will gain insight into the complex interactions between humpback whales and their environment, which will deepen their appreciation for these majestic creatures and the continued need for conservation initiatives.

Summarizes the results of the ongoing monitoring of humpback whales in Glacier Bay and Icy Strait during the 1987 summer season.

Summarizes the results of the ongoing monitoring of humpback whales in Glacier Bay and Icy Strait during the 1986 summer season.

Unlike some other reproductions of classic texts (1) We have not used OCR(Optical Character Recognition), as this leads to bad quality books with introduced typos. (2) In books where there are images such as portraits, maps, sketches etc We have endeavoured to keep the quality of these images, so they represent accurately the original artefact. Although occasionally there may be certain imperfections with these old texts, we feel they deserve to be made available for future generations to enjoy.

Relative to other baleen whale populations, the humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae inhabiting Southeast Alaska are noteworthy in that they form large, enduring groups when foraging on schools of Pacific herring Clupea harengus pallasi. These groups use a variety of unusual feeding tactics when attacking prey, including the production of loud feeding calls, the release of bubbles, and the waving of their large pectoral flippers. Past observations of these groups have been largely anecdotal so little is known about their social behavior or the function of their feeding tactics. In particular, it is unclear if these pods are based on cooperative interactions or if they represent groups of individuals who are competing for prey that occurs in dense aggregations. In addition, little is known about the underlying social structure of these pods and whether they are composed of kin. The objective of this study was to employ field and laboratory techniques to gain insight into the function of the unusual feeding tactics, and to describe the basic social structure of these pods. In order to test the prediction that bubbles, feeding calls, and flipper movements represent prey manipulation tactics, herring schools were brought into the laboratory and subjected to various simulated humpback whale feeding behaviors. I found that these simulated behaviors produced strong avoidance responses from the herring schools, suggesting that humpback whales use these tactics to manipulate the behavior of their prey. Seven years of field observations revealed that humpbacks with enduring social bonds (i.e., high coefficients of association) specialized on herring and represented a small proportion of the entire whale population. Calves born to these "core members" were never observed to return and feed with their mothers in subsequent years, suggesting that these groups are not composed of close kin. This was verified by analysis of haplotype variation in the mitochondrial genome and microsatellite variation in the nuclear genome. Individuals within these pods appear to invest in by-product benefits, with the enduring bonds between whales in Chatham Strait (cf. krill feeders in Frederick Sound) possibly representing combinations of individuals performing compatible tasks (Le., bubble blower, herder, vocalizer).

Humpback whales are a major predator in Sitka Sound, possibly consuming as much as a half-ton of Pacific herring per day. These large migratory baleen whales congregate in Sitka Sound to feed on schools of Pacific herring which spawn in April. In recent decades humpback whale abundance has increased tremendously in Sitka Sound after recovering from near extinction due to commercial whaling. In order to assess the long-term impact on herring by humpback whales, I estimated humpback whale abundance from 1981 to 2011. To do so I developed a Bayesian mark-recapture method for small sample sizes. I also modified a multi-strata Hilborn model to account for sporadic availability of whales in Sitka Sound. The multi-million dollar sac roe fishery in Sitka Sound is managed by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) with an Age-Structured Assessment model (ASA). I modified the standard ASA model by including the humpback whale abundance estimates as a covariate for herring natural mortality. I found that there is no significant effect of humpback whales on herring mortality. In fact, both Pacific herring and humpback whale abundance have increased together, reaching their maximum values in 2011. This suggests that some other factor, perhaps better marine survival for both species, is driving their upwards trend.

Understanding the movement behavior and foraging strategies of individuals across multiple spatial and temporal scales is essential not only for understanding the biological requirements of individuals but also for linking individual strategies to population level effects. Glacial fjords scattered throughout south-central and southeastern Alaska host some of the largest seasonal aggregations of harbor seals (Phoca vitulina richardii) in the world, and an estimated 15% of the harbor seal population in Alaska is found seasonally at these glacial ice sites. Over the last two decades, the number of harbor seals has declined at two of the primary glacial fjords, in Aialik Bay in south-central Alaska and in Glacier Bay in southeastern Alaska, thus raising concerns regarding the viability of seal populations in glacial fjord environments. From 2004-2009, the foraging ecology, diving behavior, and migration patterns of harbor seals from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska were examined in relation to prey availability and oceanographic features in Glacier Bay and the surrounding regions of southeastern Alaska. Time-depth recorders, very high frequency transmitters, and satellite-linked transmitters were used to quantify the vertical and horizontal movement patterns of harbor seals in the marine environment. Specifically, (1) I characterized the diving behavior, foraging areas, and foraging strategies of female harbor seals from terrestrial and glacial ice sites relative to prey availability during the breeding season (May-June) in Glacier Bay, (2) I quantified the intra-population variation in at-sea post-breeding season (September-April) distribution and movement patterns of female harbor seals in relation to oceanographic features, (3) I quantified the post-breeding season migration patterns of female harbor seals relative to the boundaries of the marine protected area of Glacier Bay National Park, and (4) I characterized the use of the continental shelf region of the eastern Gulf of Alaska by female harbor seals from Glacier Bay, both as a foraging area and as a migratory corridor in relation to oceanographic features. During the breeding season, there was a substantial degree of intra-population variation in the diving behavior and foraging areas of juvenile and adult female seals from glacial ice and terrestrial sites in Glacier Bay. The presence of multiple diving strategies suggests that differences in the relative density and depth of prey fields in glacial ice and terrestrial habitats in addition to seal age and reproductive status may influence diving and foraging behavior of harbor seals. During the post-breeding season, juvenile and adult female harbor seals ranged extensively beyond the boundaries of the marine protected area of Glacier Bay National Park, throughout the northern inshore waters of southeastern Alaska and the continental shelf region of the eastern Gulf of Alaska between Cross Sound and Prince William Sound, Alaska (up to 900 kilometers away). Seals exhibited a relatively high degree of intra-population variation in their at-sea post-breeding season distribution patterns that may be a function of extrinsic factors such as oceanographic characteristics, which can influence prey availability as well as intrinsic factors including previous experience with foraging areas and seal condition and age. Use of the continental shelf region of the eastern Gulf of Alaska by harbor seals as a foraging area may be due to enhanced biological productivity which may be associated with ephemeral hydrographic and/or static bathymetric features. Despite extensive migrations of seals from Glacier Bay during the post-breeding season, there was a high degree of inter-annual site fidelity of seals to Glacier Bay the following breeding season after seals were captured.