Poetically Correct Banned By The Free Press

Ms. Louise magnifies into verse, using a variety of creative formats, the very questions that arise during certain events we are a part of both personally and globally. At the forefront is the media, chosen by the few and fed to the many. Much of this author's work had been accepted and printed until the poem "Sunday Hypocrite" got censured for the raw truth it conveyed. Told that, "Freedom of The Press", had only to do with "their freedom to choose" what is best for the public to read. This book covers the last eight years, specifically by date. The opening Mag-Art is more potent in full color as it alters advertising, using various mediums, to eliminate the message that we must buy into a material world. No other poetry book is to be found about real people, places and events, in chronological order, in poetic verse that speaks to you, rather than above you. This is a part of me for that part of you. With Poetically Correct, Louise declares that poets defined this country. She does not believe that truth is found in newspapers or politicians speeches. Instead, Louise points to poetry as societys truth teller. She asks the reader to consider human behavior, the impact of silence, and what freedom really means. - ForeWord Clarion Review (4 out of 5 stars) Acknowledging C.S. Lewis and Dr. Seuss as influences, Louises poems contain those authors respective emphases on transcendent morality and a child-like embrace of the wonders of the world. - BlueInk Review An engaging collection of poems. - Kirkus Reviews

Her work began at the age of fourteen and has been chronologically documented by date keeping up with current events both personally and globally. This autobiographical collection was compiled into a self-published book covering the years of 1977-2003 entitled: A Part of Me For that Part of You. Now comes the following eight years during which swift changes have occurred for Ms. Louise personally and politically. This new title, Poetically Correct: Banned by The Free Press, was assumed, due to an encounter with a newspaper, after many years of publishing her work with them, in which they claimed that 'freedom of the press' had only to do with... the freedom of publishers to pick and choose what they would and wouldn't print. This author felt perplexed because her words are not of slander or threat. Her poem, "Sunday Hypocrite" was the first to be rejected as not fit for the public in "their" opinion.

The first collection of essays on public history in the American West.

The International Journal of Children’s Rights has been a major player in all this. Its impact is worldwide. It has established itself as the leading journal in the field. The journal is now in its 19th year, and is flourishing. This volume has been compiled not only to commemorate the journal’s work, but also the 20th anniversary of the Convention coming into operation, and of the first World Summit on Children. An anthology of the best articles published in these formative years, this volume offers a representative sample of what the journal has achieved. Some of the articles are ones which are frequently cited, whilst others are less well known; some deal with theory, others with practice. The case for children’s rights is to be found throughout this collection, as is the history of children’s rights.

This book presents a critical account of how universities censor their teaching, how student activism tends to censor the opposing side and how academics censor themselves. Renowned author James Flynn presents a compelling counterargument to those who favour banning free speech.

Dadge documents a number of disturbing incidents of attempted press censorship by the Bush administration and its public criticism of journalists who appeared to be out of step with the general patriotic fervor.

In this book, Edenborg studies contemporary conflicts of community as enacted in Russian media, from the ‘homosexual propaganda’ laws to the Sochi Olympics and the Ukraine war, and explores the role of visibility in the production and contestation of belonging to a political community. The book examines what it is that determines which subjects and narratives become visible and which are occluded in public spheres; how they are seen and made intelligible; and how those processes are involved in the imagination of communities. Investigating the differentiated consequences of visibility, Edenborg discusses what forms of visibility make belonging possible and what forms of visibility may be related to exclusion or violence. The book maps and analyses the practices and mechanisms whereby a state seeks to produce and shape belonging through controlling what becomes visible in public, and how that which becomes visible is seen and understood. In addition, it examines what forms contestation can take and what its effects may be. Advancing theoretical understanding and offering a useful way to analytically conceptualize the role of visibility in the production and contestation of political communities, this work will be of interest to students and scholars of gender and sexuality politics, borders, citizenship, nationalism, migration and ethnic relations.

Liberals represent a large majority of American faculty, especially in the social sciences and humanities. Does minority status affect the work of conservative scholars or the academy as a whole? In Passing on the Right, Dunn and Shields explore the actual experiences of conservative academics, examining how they navigate their sometimes hostile professional worlds. Offering a nuanced picture of this political minority, this book will engage academics and general readers on both sides of the political spectrum.

Although academic freedom in teaching and learning methods is crucial to a nation’s growth, the concept comes with numerous misnomers and is subjected to much academic debate and doubt. This volume maps out how truth and intellectual integrity remain the fundamental principle on which the foundation of a university should be laid.