Making Votes Count

Popular elections are at the heart of representative democracy. Thus, understanding the laws and practices that govern such elections is essential to understanding modern democracy. In this book, Cox views electoral laws as posing a variety of coordination problems that political forces must solve. Coordination problems - and with them the necessity of negotiating withdrawals, strategic voting, and other species of strategic coordination - arise in all electoral systems. This book employs a unified game-theoretic model to study strategic coordination worldwide and that relies primarily on constituency-level rather than national aggregate data in testing theoretical propositions about the effects of electoral laws. This book also considers not just what happens when political forces succeed in solving the coordination problems inherent in the electoral system they face but also what happens when they fail.

Most Americans see the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 as the culmination of the civil rights movement. When the law was enacted, black voter registration in Mississippi soared. Few black candidates won office, however. In this book, Frank Parker describes black Mississippians' battle for meaningful voting rights, bringing the story up to 1986, when Mike Espy was elected as Mississippi's first black member of Congress in this century. To nullify the impact of the black vote, white Mississippi devised a political "massive resistance" strategy, adopting such disenfranchising devices as at-large elections, racial gerrymandering, making elective offices appointive, and revising the qualifications for candidates for public office. As legal challenges to these mechanisms mounted, Mississippi once again became the testing ground for deciding whether the promises of the Fifteenth Amendment would be fulfilled, and Parker describes the court battles that ensued until black voters obtained relief.

The 2012 election will be one of the hardest-fought in U.S. history. It is also likely to be one of the closest, a fact that brings concerns about voter fraud and bureaucratic incompetence in the conduct of elections front and center. If we don't take notice, we could see another debacle like the Bush-Gore Florida recount of 2000 in which courts and lawyers intervened in what should have involved only voters. Who's Counting? will focus attention on many problems of our election system, ranging from voter fraud to a slipshod system of vote counting that noted political scientist Walter Dean Burnham calls “the most careless of the developed world.” In an effort to clean up our election laws, reduce fraud and increase public confidence in the integrity of the voting system, many states ranging from Georgia to Wisconsin have passed laws requiring a photo ID be shown at the polls and curbing the rampant use of absentee ballots, a tool of choice by fraudsters. The response from Obama allies has been to belittle the need for such laws and attack them as akin to the second coming of a racist tide in American life. In the summer of 2011, both Bill Clinton and DNC chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz preposterously claimed that such laws suppressed minority voters and represented a return to the era of Jim Crow. But voter fraud is a well-documented reality in American elections. Just this year, a sheriff and county clerk in West Virginia pleaded guilty to stuffing ballot boxes with fraudulent absentee ballots that changed the outcome of an election. In 2005, a state senate election in Tennessee was overturned because of voter fraud. The margin of victory? 13 votes. In 2008, the Minnesota senate race that provided the 60th vote needed to pass Obamacare was decided by a little over 300 votes. Almost 200 felons have already been convicted of voting illegally in that election and dozens of other prosecutions are still pending. Public confidence in the integrity of elections is at an all-time low. In the Cooperative Congressional Election Study of 2008, 62% of American voters thought that voter fraud was very common or somewhat common. Fear that elections are being stolen erodes the legitimacy of our government. That's why the vast majority of Americans support laws like Kansas's Secure and Fair Elections Act. A 2010 Rasmussen poll showed that 82% of Americans support photo ID laws. While Americans frequently demand observers and best practices in the elections of other countries, we are often blind to the need to scrutinize our own elections. We may pay the consequences in 2012 if a close election leads us into pitched partisan battles and court fights that will dwarf the Bush-Gore recount wars.

This book addresses a significant area of applied social-choice theory--the evaluation of voting procedures designed to select a single winner from a field of three or more candidates. Such procedures can differ strikingly in the election outcomes they produce, the opportunities for manipulation that they create, and the nature of the candidates--centrist or extremist--whom they advantage. The author uses computer simulations based on models of voting behavior and reconstructions of historical elections to assess the likelihood that each multicandidate voting system meets political objectives. Alternative procedures abound: the single-vote plurality method, ubiquitous in the United States, Canada, and Britain; runoff, used in certain primaries; the Borda count, based on rank scores submitted by each voter; approval voting, which permits each voter to support several candidates equally; and the Hare system of successive eliminations, to name a few. This work concludes that single-vote plurality is most often at odds with the majoritarian principle of Condorcet. Those methods most likely to choose the Condorcet candidate under sincere voting are generally the most vulnerable to manipulation. Approval voting and the Hare and runoff methods emerge from the analyses as the most reliable. Originally published in 1988. The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press. These editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback and hardcover editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since its founding in 1905.

In the evolving field of Political Science, grasping innovative electoral methods is key to improving democratic decision-making. "Majority Judgment" offers an in-depth look at a transformative voting system called Majority Judgment, detailing its principles, applications, and significance for democracy. This book is a must-read for anyone interested in modern electoral systems and their role in ensuring fair elections. 1-Majority Judgment-Understand the basics of Majority Judgment and its approach to fair voting. 2-Score Voting-Discover how Score Voting compares with Majority Judgment in enhancing voter satisfaction. 3-Condorcet Method-Learn about the Condorcet Method and its connection to Majority Judgment. 4-Copeland's Method-Examine how Copeland’s Method addresses strategic voting issues. 5-Bucklin Voting-Explore Bucklin Voting and its link to Majority Judgment principles. 6-Ranked Pairs-Understand how Ranked Pairs achieves consensus winners and relates to Majority Judgment. 7-Instant-Runoff Voting-Compare the simplicity of Instant-Runoff Voting with Majority Judgment. 8-Comparison of Electoral Systems-Compare different electoral systems and their strengths alongside Majority Judgment. 9-Evaluative Voting-Learn about Evaluative Voting and its role in Majority Judgment. 10-Usual Judgment-Understand Usual Judgment and its connection to Majority Judgment. 11-Strategic Voting-Address how Majority Judgment mitigates the effects of Strategic Voting. 12-Condorcet Winner Criterion-Learn about the Condorcet Winner Criterion and its relation to Majority Judgment. 13-Participation Criterion-Discover how Majority Judgment supports the Participation Criterion. 14-Majority Criterion-Explore how Majority Judgment ensures a majority-supported winner. 15-Consistency Criterion-Analyze how Majority Judgment meets the Consistency Criterion. 16-Mutual Majority Criterion-Understand the Mutual Majority Criterion and how it aligns with Majority Judgment. 17-Condorcet Loser Criterion-Learn how Majority Judgment avoids electing the least-preferred candidate. 18-Reversal Symmetry-Discover how Majority Judgment upholds fairness in reversed preferences. 19-Cardinal Voting-Explore the evaluative approach of Cardinal Voting and its link to Majority Judgment. 20-STAR Voting-Analyze how STAR Voting combines aspects of Score Voting and Majority Judgment. 21-Highest Median Voting Rules-Learn how Highest Median Voting Rules relate to Majority Judgment. "Majority Judgment" provides a comprehensive examination of electoral systems, offering professionals, students, and enthusiasts valuable insights into democratic processes. Its analysis extends beyond surface-level knowledge, providing a rich exploration of the impact of various voting methods.

For many of us, the presidential election of 2000 was a wake-up call. The controversy following the vote count led to demands for election reform. But the new voting systems that were subsequently introduced to the market have serious security flaws, and many are confusing and difficult to use. Moreover, legislation has not kept up with the constantly evolving voting technology, leaving little to no legal recourse when votes are improperly counted. How did we come to acquire the complex technology we now depend on to count votes? Douglas Jones and Barbara Simons probe this question, along with public policy and regulatory issues raised by our voting technologies. Broken Ballots is a thorough and incisive analysis of the current voting climate that approaches American elections from technological, legal, and historical perspectives. The authors examine the ways in which Americans vote today, gauging how inaccurate, unreliable, and insecure our voting systems are. An important book for election administrators, political scientists, and students of government and technology policy, Broken Ballots is also a vital tool for any voting American.

"Making All Votes Count!" presents a proportional presidential voting approach called, "Equal Voice Voting." It examines the 15 presidential elections from 1960-2016, comparing election results with what could have happened in those elections if Equal Voice Voting were used instead on a state-by-state basis. Equal Voice Voting closely mirrors the popular vote results while maintaining the voting voice of each state. It preserves the Electoral College and retains the Founding Fathers' intent without requiring a constitutional amendment. The results from the 2016 presidential election are compared with what could have happened if Equal Voice Voting had been used instead, on a state-by-state basis as well as across the nation. Attention is given to alternate voting approaches, such as: the popular vote, the national popular vote and congressional district voting. Attention is also given to gerrymandering showing how it is often used to manipulate voting outcomes. "Making All Votes Count!" can be used as an educational tool, as a ready reference for past presidential elections and as a tool to encourage future legislation. More than a fact-based resource, "Making All Votes Count" urges readers and legislators alike to remedy a systemic problem of our current all-or-nothing (some call it winner-takes-all) voting approach that causes many votes (and voters) to not matter in the final presidential election results. "Making All Votes Count!" points out that Equal Voice Voting can be instituted on a state-by-state basis without enacting a constitutional amendment or relying on an interstate compact. Equal Voice Voting can become a reality through the efforts of legislators interested in having all of their constituents matter rather than a selected percentage of voters.

How we can repair our democracy by rebuilding the mechanisms that power it What’s the best way to determine what most voters want when multiple candidates are running? What’s the fairest way to allocate legislative seats to different constituencies? What’s the least distorted way to draw voting districts? Not the way we do things now. Democracy is mathematical to its very foundations. Yet most of the methods in use are a historical grab bag of the shortsighted, the cynical, the innumerate, and the outright discriminatory. Making Democracy Count sheds new light on our electoral systems, revealing how a deeper understanding of their mathematics is the key to creating civic infrastructure that works for everyone. In this timely guide, Ismar Volić empowers us to use mathematical thinking as an objective, nonpartisan framework that rises above the noise and rancor of today’s divided public square. Examining our representative democracy using powerful clarifying concepts, Volić shows why our current voting system stifles political diversity, why the size of the House of Representatives contributes to its paralysis, why gerrymandering is a sinister instrument that entrenches partisanship and disenfranchisement, why the Electoral College must be rethought, and what can work better and why. Volić also discusses the legal and constitutional practicalities involved and proposes a road map for repairing the mathematical structures that undergird representative government. Making Democracy Count gives us the concrete knowledge and the confidence to advocate for a more just, equitable, and inclusive democracy.