Fair Treatment For Animals

THE argument for animal rights, a classic since its appearance in 1983, from the moral philosophical point of view. With a new preface.

Animal rights is the idea that animals should be treated with the same level of respect and consideration as human beings, and that they should be protected from unnecessary harm and exploitation. It is the belief that animals are not simply property or resources to be used for human benefit, but rather, they are sentient beings that have inherent value and deserve to be treated with compassion and empathy.This movement advocates for the fair and ethical treatment of all animals, whether they are domesticated pets, farm animals, or wildlife. It seeks to end the practices of animal cruelty, such as factory farming, animal testing, and hunting, as well as the use of animals for entertainment and sports.Animal rights activists believe that all animals have the right to live free from suffering and exploitation, and that it is our responsibility as human beings to protect and care for them. They argue that the use of animals for food, clothing, or experimentation is unnecessary and cruel, and that alternative methods should be used instead.Ultimately, the animal rights movement seeks to be the voice for animals who cannot speak for themselves, and to create a world where they can live without fear or pain. It is a call to action for all of us to recognize the importance of treating animals with kindness and respect, and to work towards a more compassionate society where their rights are protected and respected.

Argues that the way humans treat animals results from the contradiction between the ideas that animals have some rights, but that they are also property, and offers ways to resolve the conflict.

At the same time, he argues that humans have a greater interest in life and liberty than most species of nonhuman animals.

Discusses current animal rights issues, their underlying philosophies, and ways we can held curb animal abuse.

"This textbook provides an innovative, internationally oriented approach to the teaching of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and business ethics. Drawing on case studies involving companies and countries around the world, the textbook explores the social, ethical, and business dynamics underlying CSR in such areas as global warming, genetically modified organisms (GMO) in food production, free trade and fair trade, anti-sweatshop and living-wage movements, organic foods and textiles, ethical marketing practices and codes, corporate speech and lobbying, and social enterprise. The book is designed to encourage students and instructors to challenge their own assumptions and prejudices by stimulating a class debate based on each case study"--Provided by publisher.

In the past 100 years pet, zoo/aquarium, and research animals have gained unprecedented legal protection from unnecessary human harm via the creation of strict animal cruelty laws. Due to the work of moral philosophers and compassionate lawyers/judges animal cruelty laws have been improved to provide harsher punishments for violations, had their scopes widened to include more animals and had their language changed to better match our evolving conception of animals as independent living entities rather than as merely things for human use. However, while the group of pet, zoo/aquarium, and research animals has enjoyed more consideration by the US legal system, another group of animals has inexplicably been ignored. The farm animals that humans raise for use as food are exempted from nearly every state and federal animal cruelty law for no justifiable reason. In this paper I will argue that our best moral and legal theories concede that we should take animal suffering seriously, and that no relevant difference exists between the group of animals protected by animal cruelty laws and farm animals. Given the lack of a relevant distinction between these two groups I will conclude that current animal cruelty laws should be amended to include farm animals.