Ensuring Fairness And Accuracy In Elections Involving Electronic Voting Systems

Ensuring fairness and accuracy in elections involving electronic voting systems : hearing before the Subcommittee on Information Policy, Census, and National Archives of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, House of Representatives, One Hundred Tenth Congress, first session, April 18, 2007.

During the 2016 presidential election, America's election infrastructure was targeted by actors sponsored by the Russian government. Securing the Vote: Protecting American Democracy examines the challenges arising out of the 2016 federal election, assesses current technology and standards for voting, and recommends steps that the federal government, state and local governments, election administrators, and vendors of voting technology should take to improve the security of election infrastructure. In doing so, the report provides a vision of voting that is more secure, accessible, reliable, and verifiable.

Discover an innovative approach that reshapes our understanding of electoral systems. Score Then Automatic Runoff Voting explores a hybrid method combining the precision of score voting with the clarity of automatic runoffs. This book is crucial for those interested in the future of democratic representation and electoral integrity. You'll uncover the unique aspects of this system and its potential influence on election outcomes, voter satisfaction, and democracy. Here's a brief look inside: 1: STAR Voting-How STAR voting merges score voting with automatic runoff for more accurate election results. 2: Approval Voting-Understanding approval voting and its role in candidate evaluation based on voter acceptance. 3: Score Voting-Exploring score voting fundamentals and its advantage in capturing voter preferences. 4: Condorcet Method-Identifying the most preferred candidate through pairwise comparisons using the Condorcet method. 5: Copeland's Method-Learn how Copeland's method uses pairwise victories to determine the best candidate. 6: Monotonicity Criterion-Why increasing support for a candidate shouldn't harm their chances (monotonicity criterion). 7: Bucklin Voting-Multi-round Bucklin voting to find a majority winner. 8: Ranked Pairs-Facilitating ranking based on majority preferences using ranked pairs. 9: Condorcet Winner Criterion-The importance of selecting a candidate who wins in every head-to-head match. 10: Participation Criterion-Encouraging voter turnout through the participation criterion. 11: Majority Criterion-Ensuring broad support for the winning candidate via the majority criterion. 12: Mutual Majority Criterion-Favoring candidates with cross-sectional support under the mutual majority criterion. 13: Nanson's Method-Eliminating less popular candidates to find a consensus choice using Nanson's method. 14: Condorcet Loser Criterion-Ensuring a universally losing candidate isn’t elected. 15: Reversal Symmetry-Exploring fairness in electoral systems through reversal symmetry. 16: Kemeny–Young Method-Aggregating preferences for candidate ranking via the Kemeny–Young method. 17: Later-No-Harm Criterion-Ensuring lower rankings don’t harm candidates' chances (later-no-harm criterion). 18: Instant-Runoff Voting-Eliminating least popular candidates in rounds until a majority winner emerges. 19: Majority Judgment-Evaluating candidates through graded assessments using majority judgment. 20: Ranked Voting-How ranked voting systems impact voter choice and representation. 21: Comparison of Electoral Systems-Comparing strengths and weaknesses of various systems in different contexts. Score Then Automatic Runoff Voting offers a deep dive into the future of electoral innovation. By engaging with this guide, you'll enhance your understanding of voting methods and their democratic implications. Stay ahead in the evolving world of elections.

Many election officials look to electronic voting systems as a means for improving their ability to more effectively conduct and administer elections. At the same time, many information technologists and activists have raised important concerns regarding the security of such systems. Policy makers are caught in the midst of a controversy with both political and technological overtones. The public debate about electronic voting is characterized by a great deal of emotion and rhetoric. Asking the Right Questions About Electronic Voting describes the important questions and issues that election officials, policy makers, and informed citizens should ask about the use of computers and information technology in the electoral processâ€"focusing the debate on technical and policy issues that need resolving. The report finds that while electronic voting systems have improved, federal and state governments have not made the commitment necessary for e-voting to be widely used in future elections. More funding, research, and public education are required if e-voting is to become viable.

Since the 2000 presidential election, the United States has been embroiled in debates about electronic voting. Critics say the new technologies invite tampering and fraud. Advocates say they enhance the accuracy of vote counts and make casting ballots easier--and ultimately foster greater political participation. Electronic Elections cuts through the media spin to assess the advantages and risks associated with different ways of casting ballots--and shows how e-voting can be the future of American democracy. Elections by nature are fraught with risk. Michael Alvarez and Thad Hall fully examine the range of past methods and the new technologies that have been created to try to minimize risk and accurately reflect the will of voters. Drawing upon a wealth of new data on how different kinds of electronic voting machines have performed in recent elections nationwide, they evaluate the security issues that have been the subject of so much media attention, and examine the impacts the new computer-based solutions is having on voter participation. Alvarez and Hall explain why the benefits of e-voting can outweigh the challenges, and they argue that media coverage of the new technologies has emphasized their problems while virtually ignoring their enormous potential for empowering more citizens to vote. The authors also offer ways to improve voting technologies and to develop more effective means of implementing and evaluating these systems. Electronic Elections makes a case for how e-voting can work in the United States, showing why making it work right is essential to the future vibrancy of the democratic process.

Since the 2000 nat. elections, concerns have been raised regarding the election process, including voting technologies. Beginning in 2001, there have been a series of reports examining every aspect of the elections process; these were used by Congress in framing the Help America Vote Act, which provided for replacement of older voting equip. with modern electronic voting systems (EVS) & estab. the Election Assist. Comm. to lead the nation¿s election reform efforts. This report details: the contextual role & characteristics of EVS; the range of security & reliability concerns that have been reported; the experiences & mgmt. practices of states & local jurisdictions; & the long-standing & emerging challenges facing all levels of gov¿t. in using EVS. Ill.

The Brennan Center at NYU convened a high-level task force of voting experts from government, academia, and business to systematically analyze various threats to voting technologies that are widely used across the country today. This book offers specific remedies and countermeasures to identify and protect democratic elections from widespread fraud and sabotage.