Censorship Vs Press

An examination of how the media is under fire and how to safeguard journalists and the information they seek to share with the public. Journalists are being imprisoned and killed in record numbers. Online surveillance is annihilating privacy, and the Internet can be brought under government control at any time. Joel Simon, the executive director of the Committee to Protect Journalists, warns that we can no longer assume that our global information ecosystem is stable, protected, and robust. Journalists are increasingly vulnerable to attack by authoritarian governments, militants, criminals, and terrorists, who all seek to use technology, political pressure, and violence to set the global information agenda. Reporting from Pakistan, Russia, Turkey, Egypt, and Mexico, among other hotspots, Simon finds journalists under threat from all sides. The result is a growing crisis in information—a shortage of the news we need to make sense of our globalized world and fight human rights abuses, manage conflict, and promote accountability. Drawing on his experience defending journalists on the front lines, he calls on “global citizens,” U.S. policy makers, international law advocates, and human rights groups to create a global freedom-of-expression agenda tied to trade, climate, and other major negotiations. He proposes ten key priorities, including combating the murder of journalists, ending censorship, and developing a global free-expression charter to challenge the criminal and corrupt forces that seek to manipulate the world's news. “Wise and insightful. [Simon] offers hope to all who care about maintaining the free flow of information in a world full of would-be censors.”—Ann Cooper, Columbia Journalism School

American public schools often censor controversial student speech that the Constitution protects. Lessons in Censorship brings clarity to a bewildering array of court rulings that define the speech rights of young citizens in the school setting. Catherine J. Ross examines disputes that have erupted in our schools and courts over the civil rights movement, war and peace, rights for LGBTs, abortion, immigration, evangelical proselytizing, and the Confederate flag. She argues that the failure of schools to respect civil liberties betrays their educational mission and threatens democracy. From the 1940s through the Warren years, the Supreme Court celebrated free expression and emphasized the role of schools in cultivating liberty. But the Burger, Rehnquist, and Roberts courts retreated from that vision, curtailing certain categories of student speech in the name of order and authority. Drawing on hundreds of lower court decisions, Ross shows how some judges either misunderstand the law or decline to rein in censorship that is clearly unconstitutional, and she powerfully demonstrates the continuing vitality of the Supreme Court’s initial affirmation of students’ expressive rights. Placing these battles in their social and historical context, Ross introduces us to the young protesters, journalists, and artists at the center of these stories. Lessons in Censorship highlights the troubling and growing tendency of schools to clamp down on off-campus speech such as texting and sexting and reveals how well-intentioned measures to counter verbal bullying and hate speech may impinge on free speech. Throughout, Ross proposes ways to protect free expression without disrupting education.

Attacks on the Press -- Contents -- Introduction: The New Face of Censorship -- 1. Where I've Never Set Foot -- 2. From Fledgling to Failed -- 3. A Loyal Press -- 4. What Is the Worst-Case Scenario? -- 5. Thwarting Freedom of Information -- Case in Point -- 6. Disrupting the Debate -- 7. Discredited -- 8. Chinese Import -- 9. Willing Accomplice -- 10. Edited by Drug Lords -- 11. Self-Restraint vs. Self-Censorship -- 12. Connecting Cuba -- 13. Supervised Access -- 14. Fiscal Blackmail -- 15. Right Is Might -- 16. Eluding the Censors -- 17. Zone of Silence -- 18. Being a Target -- 19. Fighting for the Truth -- Index -- EULA

Political Censorship of the Arts and the Press in Nineteenth-Century Europe presents a comprehensive account of the attempts by authorities throughout Europe to stifle the growth of political opposition during the nineteenth-century by censoring newspapers, books, caricatures, plays, operas and film. Appeals for democracy and social reform were especially suspect to the authorities, so in Russia cookbooks which refered to 'free air' in ovens were censored as subversive, while in England in 1829 the censor struck from a play the remark that 'honest men at court don't take up much room'. While nineteenth-century European political censorship blocked the open circulation of much opposition writing and art, it never succeeded entirely in its aim since writers, artists and 'consumers' often evaded the censors by clandestine circulation of forbidden material and by the widely practised skill of 'reading between the lines'.

This book focuses on regulatory challenges of creating and sustaining freedom of speech and freedom of information two decades after the fall of the Berlin wall, in global, comparative context. Some chapters overview, others address specific issues, or describe country case studies. Instead of trying to provide an exhaustive assessment which in one volume might not reach deeper analyzes of contextual details, this book will shed light on and help better understanding of general challenges for freedom of speech and information through varying comparative examples and highlighting important regulatory questions.

A groundbreaking and surprising look at contemporary censorship in China As authoritarian governments around the world develop sophisticated technologies for controlling information, many observers have predicted that these controls would be easily evaded by savvy internet users. In Censored, Margaret Roberts demonstrates that even censorship that is easy to circumvent can still be enormously effective. Taking advantage of digital data harvested from the Chinese internet and leaks from China's Propaganda Department, Roberts sheds light on how censorship influences the Chinese public. Drawing parallels between censorship in China and the way information is manipulated in the United States and other democracies, she reveals how internet users are susceptible to control even in the most open societies. Censored gives an unprecedented view of how governments encroach on the media consumption of citizens.

"Censorship vs. Press Freedom Worldwide" is a comprehensive and thought-provoking exploration of the ongoing battle between censorship and press freedom on a global scale. This book delves deep into the complex dynamics and multifaceted challenges faced by media, journalists, and societies in their pursuit of a free and responsible press. Key Features: Global Perspectives: This book provides a global perspective on censorship and press freedom, highlighting case studies and examples from various regions, offering a comprehensive understanding of the state of media worldwide. Historical Context: Gain insights into the historical evolution of censorship and press freedom, tracing their roots and the forces that have shaped the contemporary media landscape. Challenges Faced: Delve into the multifaceted challenges faced by journalists, media organizations, and societies, such as political pressures, technological disruptions, and safety concerns, which impact the freedom of the press. Impact on Democracy: Explore the critical role of a free press in promoting and sustaining democratic societies, and the potential consequences of censorship on the health of democracy. Legal and Ethical Considerations: Examine the legal and ethical dimensions of censorship and press freedom, considering the boundaries of free expression, journalistic integrity, and responsible reporting. Journalists' Stories: Hear the voices of journalists who have faced censorship and persecution as they share their personal experiences and the risks they take to uncover the truth. Future of Media: Contemplate the future of media in an increasingly digital world and the implications for both censorship and press freedom, as well as emerging strategies for safeguarding the freedom of the press. "Censorship vs. Press Freedom Worldwide" is a vital resource for academics, journalists, policymakers, and anyone interested in the critical role that a free press plays in society. It invites readers to critically examine the challenges facing the media landscape today and underscores the importance of upholding press freedom as an essential pillar of democracy. This book offers a global perspective on the ongoing struggle between censorship and the preservation of a free and responsible press, encouraging reflection and dialogue on the values that underpin this essential freedom.

The updated paperback edition of HATE dispels misunderstandings plaguing our perennial debates about "hate speech vs. free speech," showing that the First Amendment approach promotes free speech and democracy, equality, and societal harmony. As "hate speech" has no generally accepted definition, we hear many incorrect assumptions that it is either absolutely unprotected or absolutely protected from censorship. Rather, U.S. law allows government to punish hateful or discriminatory speech in specific contexts when it directly causes imminent serious harm. Yet, government may not punish such speech solely because its message is disfavored, disturbing, or vaguely feared to possibly contribute to some future harm. "Hate speech" censorship proponents stress the potential harms such speech might further: discrimination, violence, and psychic injuries. However, there has been little analysis of whether censorship effectively counters the feared injuries. Citing evidence from many countries, this book shows that "hate speech" are at best ineffective and at worst counterproductive. Therefore, prominent social justice advocates worldwide maintain that the best way to resist hate and promote equality is not censorship, but rather, vigorous "counterspeech" and activism.

Examines the history of censorship in the media, discusses seven prominent cases of media censorship, and presents a chronological history of twenty-eight media-censorship court cases since 1812.