Capital Asset Pricing Model Capm A Case Study

Seminar paper from the year 2015 in the subject Business economics - Investment and Finance, grade: 1,00, University of Innsbruck (Department of Banking and Finance), course: Proseminar: Financial Management, language: English, abstract: The purpose of this paper is to do empirical research on the capital asset pricing model. The bases of our research are the returns of three stocks, the S&P 500 index which represents the market and the LIBOR as a proxy for the risk-free interest rate. The three companies that were chosen in this paper were Kellogg Company, KB Financial Group Inc. and Kate Spade & Company and all of them in combination represent our fictive market.

This compelling book examines the price-based revolution in investing, showing how research over recent decades has reinvented technical analysis. The authors discuss the major groups of price-based strategies, considering their theoretical motivation, individual and combined implementation, and back-tested results when applied to investment across country stock markets. Containing a comprehensive sample of performance data, taken from 24 major developed markets around the world and ranging over the last 25 years, the authors construct practical portfolios and display their performance—ensuring the book is not only academically rigorous, but practically applicable too. This is a highly useful volume that will be of relevance to researchers and students working in the field of price-based investing, as well as individual investors, fund pickers, market analysts, fund managers, pension fund consultants, hedge fund portfolio managers, endowment chief investment officers, futures traders, and family office investors.

This book proposes a new capital asset pricing model dubbed the ZCAPM that outperforms other popular models in empirical tests using US stock returns. The ZCAPM is derived from Fischer Black’s well-known zero-beta CAPM, itself a more general form of the famous capital asset pricing model (CAPM) by 1990 Nobel Laureate William Sharpe and others. It is widely accepted that the CAPM has failed in its theoretical relation between market beta risk and average stock returns, as numerous studies have shown that it does not work in the real world with empirical stock return data. The upshot of the CAPM’s failure is that many new factors have been proposed by researchers. However, the number of factors proposed by authors has steadily increased into the hundreds over the past three decades. This new ZCAPM is a path-breaking asset pricing model that is shown to outperform popular models currently in practice in finance across different test assets and time periods. Since asset pricing is central to the field of finance, it can be broadly employed across many areas, including investment analysis, cost of equity analyses, valuation, corporate decision making, pension portfolio management, etc. The ZCAPM represents a revolution in finance that proves the CAPM as conceived by Sharpe and others is alive and well in a new form, and will certainly be of interest to academics, researchers, students, and professionals of finance, investing, and economics.

Make smart investment decisions to build a strong portfolio This book is a practical and accessible guide to understanding and implementing the capital asset pricing model, providing you with the essential information and saving time. In 50 minutes you will be able to: • Understand the uses of the capital asset pricing model and how you can apply it to your own portfolio • Analyze the components of your current portfolio and its level of efficiency to assess which assets you should retain and which you should remove • Calculate the level of risk involved in new investments so that you make the right decisions and build the most efficient portfolio possible ABOUT 50MINUTES.COM | Management & Marketing 50MINUTES.COM provides the tools to quickly understand the main theories and concepts that shape the economic world of today. Our publications are easy to use and they will save you time. They provide elements of theory and case studies, making them excellent guides to understand key concepts in just a few minutes. In fact, they are the starting point to take action and push your business to the next level.

This proceedings volume presents current research and innovative solutions into capital markets, particularly in Poland. Featuring contributions presented at the 10th Capital Market Effective Investments (CMEI 2018) conference held in Międzyzdroje, Poland, this book explores the future of capital markets in Poland as well as comparing it with the capital markets of other developed regions around the world. Divided into four parts, the enclosed papers provide a background into the theoretical foundations of capital market investments, explores different approaches—both classical and contemporary—to investment decision making, analyzes the behaviors of investors using experimental economics and behavioral finance, and explores practical issues related to financial market investments, including real case studies. In addition, each part of the book begins with an introductory chapter written by thematic editors that provides an outline of the subject area and a summary of the papers presented.

The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and the mean-variance (M-V) rule, which are based on classic expected utility theory, have been heavily criticized theoretically and empirically. The advent of behavioral economics, prospect theory and other psychology-minded approaches in finance challenges the rational investor model from which CAPM and M-V derive. Haim Levy argues that the tension between the classic financial models and behavioral economics approaches is more apparent than real. This book aims to relax the tension between the two paradigms. Specifically, Professor Levy shows that although behavioral economics contradicts aspects of expected utility theory, CAPM and M-V are intact in both expected utility theory and cumulative prospect theory frameworks. There is furthermore no evidence to reject CAPM empirically when ex-ante parameters are employed. Professionals may thus comfortably teach and use CAPM and behavioral economics or cumulative prospect theory as coexisting paradigms.

This popular textbook offers a broad and accessible introduction to the building blocks of modern finance: financial markets, institutions and instruments. Focussing on the core elements of the subject, the author blends theory with real-life data, cases and numerical worked examples, linking the material to practice at just the right level of technical complexity. This new edition has updated data and cases throughout, ensuring that it is as up-to-date as possible in this fast-moving area. More assessment and self-test resources have been added to the book to help support students and lecturers. It is ideally suited to students at all levels who take economics, business and finance courses, as well as for those who want to understand the workings of the modern financial world. New to this Edition: - New case studies, including coverage of the Libor and foreign exchange rigging scandals, Bitcoin, the FinTech revolution and issues raised by Brexit - Fully updated data and relevant numerical examples - Coverage of derivatives such as futures, options and swaps - Extensive discussion of regulatory developments since the financial crisis - A companion website featuring teaching resources is available

The focus of the case study is the use of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) in measuring the cost of equity and discussion of its primary weaknesses as a model, such as assuming one single source of risk (i.e., market risk). The case attempts to compute the CAPM sensitivity factor (beta) for two different stocks: Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd and Larsen & Toubro Ltd, and to determine the fund manager's investment strategies in selecting the right stock. The case outlines market risk influence on the covariance among assets using a regression model. The fund manager wants to know the risk and expected return of the different stocks and decides to use the classic CAPM to value the cost of equity, which primarily includes the beta coefficient and market premium. The objective of the case study is to apply CAPM to these two stocks and to compute each asset's sensitivity (i.e., beta) to non-diversifiable market risk. To do that, we will use a simple linear regression model, then a normal process to validate the model's assumptions and ensure its stability over the data sample. Moreover, the case compares the cost of equity calculation of two different companies, one with high risk and the other with low risk, using the CAPM approach.

The problem addressed in this dissertation research was the inability of the single-factor capital asset pricing model (CAPM) to identify relevant risk factors that investors consider in forming their return expectations for investing in individual stocks. Identifying the appropriate risk factors is important for investment decision making and is pertinent to the formation of stocks' prices in the stock market. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine theoretical and empirical validity of the CAPM and to develop and test a multifactor model to address and resolve the empirical shortcomings of the single-factor CAPM. To verify the empirical validity of the standard CAPM and of the multifactor model, five hypotheses were developed and tested against historical monthly data for U.S. public companies. Testing the CAPM hypothesis revealed that the explanatory power of the overall stock market rate of return in explaining individual stock's expected rates of return is very weak, suggesting the existence of other risk factors. Testing of the other hypotheses verified that the implied volatility of the overall market as a systematic risk factor and the companies' size and financial leverage as nonsystematic risk factors are important in determining stock's expected returns and investors should consider these factors in their investment decisions. The findings of this research have important implications for social change. The outcome of this study can change the way individual and institutional investors as well as corporations make investment decisions and thus change the equilibrium prices in the stock market. These changes in turn could lead to significant changes in the resource allocation in the economy, in the economy's production capacity and production composition, and in the employment structure of the society.

Sharpe's (1964) Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) assumes that the relationship between risk and return is positive, linear and significant. However, it is not free from controversies and one of them advocates replacing CAPM's beta by downside beta based on investors' preference of downside risk. Roy (1952) debates that investor care for downside risk and Hogan and Warren (1974) replace variance with semivariance in CAPM as the first official version of downside risk based CAPM. Bawa (1975), Fishburn (1977) and Bawa and Lindenberg (1977) develop and extend proxy for downside risk/beta as Lower Partial Moment. This study empirically tests beta and downside beta based CAPM (DCAPM). Conceptual and empirical problems related in testing alternative models are discussed with adoption of Fama-MacBeth (1973) procedure by making it robust. This study inspects intercept, risk-return relationship, nonlinearities and effect of residuals for both CAPM and DCAPM. Intercept results are almost similar and they follow introduction of zero-beta models as outlined by Black et al. (1972). Both models show rejection of nonlinearities and effect of residuals. However, DCAPM comes out to be strong contender compared to CAPM for risk-return relationship. These results are consistent with Estrada (2002), Ang et al.(2004) and Post and Vliet (2004).