Brief For The United States Of America Appellee

Excerpt from In the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: George A. Buhler, Appellant, Vs. United States of America, Appellee; Opening Brief for Appellant, George A. Buhler Statement of the case 1 U. S. Penal Code, Section 215 l U. S. Penal Code, Section 37 2 Assignment of errors 4 7. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

Excerpt from United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: William L. Paul, Appellant, Vs United States of America, Appellee, Brief of William L. Paul, Appellant, Upon Appeal From the United States District Court for the Territory of Alaska, Division No. 1., James Wickersham, Henry Roden, Attorneys for Appellant That the plea of guilty was forced from your petitioner and was not a voluntary plea, so that he entered the said plea under threat of the United States Attorney that expensive and dilatory proceedings in admiralty would be started if the said plea was not entered. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

This document is a brief to the U.S. Supreme Court filed in the combined appeal from the decision of the District Court in several cases. The brief is filed on behalf of the following parties who were all defendants below: Reading Company (Jackson E, Reynolds, counsel); Philadelphia & Reading Railway Company (Charles Heebner, counsel) and The Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Company (John G. Johnson, counsel). These parties appear in the U.S. Supreme Court as both appellants and appellees, due to the combination of the cases below.