Best Answers For Should The U S Ban Capital Punishment

We've asked dozens of people the following questions: "Justice: What are the arguments against capital punishment (death penalty)?" and "Should capital punishment be abolished? Why, or why not?." Here are the top answers. These answers were picked as being the most inspiring and interesting of all the given answers. Enjoy."

We've asked dozens of people the following questions: "Should capital punishment be abolished? Why or why not?" and "Should the U.S. ban capital punishment?". Here are the top answers. These answers were picked as being the most inspiring and interesting of all the given answers. Enjoy.

Experts on both side of the issue speak out both for and against capital punishment and the rationale behind their individual beliefs.

Is the death penalty a deterrent? Is it applied disproportionately to certain ethnic groups? How harsh is life on death row? In this expanded new edition the author examines these and other controversial issues, draws conclusions from the current research, and discusses their implication for social policy. Topics such as capital punishment policies around the world, executions in the United States, public opinion on the death penalty, juries and the death penalty, and economic analyses of the deterrent factor all receive comprehensive coverage. Appendices round out this newly revised and updated text with studies on public attitudes toward rape and capital punishment, and the deterrent effect of executions on the homicide rate in the United States.

Is capital punishment morally justified? Although the issue generates strong opinions, there are no easy answers when it comes to taking the life of a human being. Supporters of the death penalty believe it deters law-breaking and is the only punishment strong enough for horrific crimes such as child murder and genocide. Opponents argue that it violates human rights and point to its finality in the face of judicial system error and unfairness. This resource presents a fascinating progression of current viewpoints that reflect the many facets of the death penalty debate.

From 1965 until 1980, there was a virtual moratorium on executions for capital offenses in the United States. This was due primarily to protracted legal proceedings challenging the death penalty on constitutional grounds. After much Sturm und Drang, the Supreme Court of the United States, by a divided vote, finally decided that "the death penalty does not invariably violate the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment." The Court's decisions, however, do not moot the controversy about the death penalty or render this excellent book irrelevant. The ball is now in the court of the Legislature and the Executive. Leg islatures, federal and state, can impose or abolish the death penalty, within the guidelines prescribed by the Supreme Court. A Chief Executive can commute a death sentence. And even the Supreme Court can change its mind, as it has done on many occasions and did, with respect to various aspects of the death penalty itself, durlog the moratorium period. Also, the people can change their minds. Some time ago, a majority, according to reliable polls, favored abolition. Today, a substantial majority favors imposition of the death penalty. The pendulum can swing again, as it has done in the past.

We've asked dozens of people the following questions: "Justice: What are the arguments against capital punishment (death penalty)?" and "Should capital punishment be abolished? Why, or why not?." Here are the top answers. These answers were picked as being the most inspiring and interesting of all the given answers. Enjoy."

Describes the debate about the death penalty raising questions about whether it is justified, whether it is ever humane, who dies and who lives, and whether the death penalty ever makes society safer.