Model Rules of Professional Conduct

Model Rules of Professional Conduct
Author: American Bar Association. House of Delegates
Publisher: American Bar Association
Total Pages: 216
Release: 2007
Genre: Law
ISBN: 9781590318737


Download Model Rules of Professional Conduct Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle

The Model Rules of Professional Conduct provides an up-to-date resource for information on legal ethics. Federal, state and local courts in all jurisdictions look to the Rules for guidance in solving lawyer malpractice cases, disciplinary actions, disqualification issues, sanctions questions and much more. In this volume, black-letter Rules of Professional Conduct are followed by numbered Comments that explain each Rule's purpose and provide suggestions for its practical application. The Rules will help you identify proper conduct in a variety of given situations, review those instances where discretionary action is possible, and define the nature of the relationship between you and your clients, colleagues and the courts.

The Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Economics and the Law

The Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Economics and the Law
Author: Eyal Zamir
Publisher: Oxford Handbooks
Total Pages: 841
Release: 2014
Genre: Business & Economics
ISBN: 0199945470


Download The Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Economics and the Law Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle

'The Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Economics and Law' brings together leading scholars of law, psychology, and economics to provide an up-to-date and comprehensive analysis of this field of research, including its strengths and limitations as well as a forecast of its future development. Its twenty-nine chapters are organized into four parts.

Attitudes Among Legal Professionals

Attitudes Among Legal Professionals
Author:
Publisher:
Total Pages: 22
Release: 2016
Genre: Evidence, Expert
ISBN:


Download Attitudes Among Legal Professionals Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle

Media provides an image of science, as used by law, in an unflattering light. Scientific experts are portrayed as misrepresenting and obscuring the truth of research to support a position at the behest of lawyers and their clients. This research examines the occurrence of "junk science" in courts and relates doctrinal and values theories to explain its presence. An investigation of attitudes towards science is conducted using General Social Survey data to test whether legal professionals hold more negative views towards the scientific community than peers in other fields. The regressions suggest that legal professionals may in fact have more confidence in the scientific community than their peers, but available data is not sufficient to make a statistically significant determination. Discussion of how the study could be improved is conducted to provide a path for future research into the relationship between science and law.